This detection rule identifies potential brute force attacks by monitoring for repeated authentication failures that align with the DuBrute behavioral patterns. The SOC team should proactively hunt for these events in Azure Sentinel to distinguish legitimate user activity from early-stage credential stuffing attempts before they escalate into successful account compromises.
rule dubrute : bruteforcer toolkit
{
meta:
author = "Christian Rebischke (@sh1bumi)"
date = "2015-09-05"
description = "Rules for DuBrute Bruteforcer"
in_the_wild = true
family = "Hackingtool/Bruteforcer"
strings:
$a = "WBrute"
$b = "error.txt"
$c = "good.txt"
$d = "source.txt"
$e = "bad.txt"
$f = "Generator IP@Login;Password"
condition:
//check for MZ Signature at offset 0
uint16(0) == 0x5A4D
and
//check for dubrute specific strings
$a and $b and $c and $d and $e and $f
}
This YARA rule can be deployed in the following contexts:
This rule contains 6 string patterns in its detection logic.
Here are 4 specific false positive scenarios for the DuBrute Bruteforcer detection rule in an enterprise environment, along with recommended filters or exclusions:
Scheduled Password Rotation via Service Accounts
LogonType is 3 (Network) or 10 (RemoteInteractive) originating from known service account names (e.g., svc_ansible_rotation, svc_chef_client).Enterprise MDM Device Enrollment and Policy Sync
UserAgent strings containing “Intune.MAM”, “JamfPro”, or “WorkspaceONE”. Additionally, exclude events where the failure reason is specifically “Authentication policy mismatch” rather than “Invalid credentials.”Legacy Application Batch Processing Jobs