This hunt hypothesis targets the execution of the SVKProtector v132 engine by Pavol Cerven to identify potential legitimate security tool activity or unexpected deployment within the environment. Proactive hunting is recommended in Azure Sentinel to distinguish this specific YARA signature from anomalous behavior that could indicate a new security agent installation, a false positive requiring tuning, or an adversary leveraging similar protection mechanisms for stealth.
rule SVKProtectorv132EngPavolCerven
{
meta:
author="malware-lu"
strings:
$a0 = { 60 E8 00 00 00 00 5D 81 ED 06 00 00 00 EB 05 B8 06 36 42 00 64 A0 23 00 00 00 EB 03 C7 84 E8 84 C0 EB 03 C7 84 E9 75 67 B9 49 00 00 00 8D B5 C5 02 00 00 56 80 06 44 46 E2 FA 8B 8D C1 02 00 00 5E 55 51 6A 00 56 FF 95 0C 61 00 00 59 5D 40 85 C0 75 3C 80 3E }
condition:
$a0 at pe.entry_point
}
This YARA rule can be deployed in the following contexts:
This rule contains 1 string patterns in its detection logic.
Here are 5 specific false positive scenarios for the SVKProtectorv132EngPavolCerven detection rule, including suggested filters and exclusions tailored for an enterprise environment:
Scenario: Automated Backup Agent Execution
vbr.exe or commcell_service) loads the SVK protector module to verify file integrity before archiving.VeeamTransportService.exe, CommServe.exe, or vssvc.exe running under a dedicated service account (e.g., DOMAIN\BackupSvc).Scenario: Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Policy Updates
SYSTEM account with a parent process named FalconSensor.exe or MsMpEng.exe.Scenario: Software Deployment via Configuration Management